Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Clark v. Gabriel — Concurrence

I would take a different view if this were a case where a registrant was moved from a CO (conscientious objector) classification to I-A because he made a speech, unpopular with the Board.
This would also be a different case if the registrant were a member of an institutionalized group, [1] such as the Quakers, whose opposition to war was well known and the registrant, though perhaps unpopular with the Board, was a bona fide member of the group.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Clark v. Gabriel — Concurrence

In 1965, after he obtained a copy of Form 150 by which a registrant files for conscientious objector status, Gabriel filled out the form and sent his local draft board an accompanying letter explaining his conscientious convictions:
'As a Negro I firmly believe the United States Government has willfully let the Negro be deprived of his rights therefore the debt of forced service claimed arbitrarily from all eligible men for the purpose of fighting for the United States rights is in the Negroes case void.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Clark v. Gabriel — Concurrence

After conducting its investigation, the Department of Justice filed a 'recommendation' with the local board, suggesting that Gabriel be denied CO status:
'He said that he is definitely not a communist. * * * The registrant advised that he is, and has been, consistently nonviolent, and that he has never been a member of any aggressive anti-war demonstrations.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature