Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Public Utilities Commission of California v…

In the absence of an express federal policy to nullify state regulation, this Court's decisions make clear that the fact that the Government may not henceforth receive more advantageous shipping rates in California than those applicable to other intrastate shippers is not sufficient by itself to vitiate this state statute. The fact that the economic incidence of state price regulation or taxation falls upon the Government no longer alone gives rise to an implied constitutional immunity from such regulation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Public Utilities Commission of California v…

Although Congress can no doubt foreclose a State from regulation of transportation rates between the Government and private carriers, such a purpose must be made manifest. The excerpts from federal procurement statutes and regulations quoted in the Court's opinion provide, in my view, an inadequate foundation for the conclusion that Congress has directed procurement officers to by-pass state minimum-price or rate regulation. It is difficult to believe that so important a decision has been taken in such an obscure manner.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Public Utilities Commission of California v…

The seriousness of the impact of California's regulation on the action of federal procurement officials is dramatically shown by this record.
It is the practice of the Government not only to negotiate separate rates which vary from the class or 'paper rate' [11] but also to negotiate a 'freight all kinds' rate which will cover hundreds of diverse items for the supply of a division of the Army or for a vessel that are needed at one place at one particular time. There is no provision in the California Code or the regulations for the making of such shipments.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature