Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas,  United States v. Augenblick — Opinion of the Court

“ In United States v. Bevilacqua, 18 U.S.C.M.A. 10, 11-12, 39 C.M.R. 10, 11-12, decided November 8, 1968, that court held that it has jurisdiction 'to accord relief to an accused who has palpably been denied constitutional rights in any court-martial; and that an accused who has been deprived of his rights need not go outside the military justice system to find relief in the civilian courts of the Federal judiciary.' [4]
Prior to the enactment of Article 76, the Court of Claims had entertained suits for back pay brought by servicemen who had been convicted by courts- martial.
”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas,  United States v. Augenblick — Opinion of the Court

“ United States, supra, at 353, 79 S.Ct. at 1225, that the administration of the Jencks Act must be entrusted to the 'good sense and experience' of the trial judges subject to 'appropriately limited review of appellate courts.' We cannot conclude that when it came to the 'rough notes' of Mendelson, the law officer and Board of Review abused their discretion in holding that they need not be produced under the Jencks Act. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature