Summary

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Grinnell Washing Mach Company v…

But the results must be a product of the combination, and not a mere aggregate of several results, each the complete product of one of the combined elements. Combined results are not necessarily a novel result, nor are they an old result obtained in a new and improved manner. Merely bringing old devices into juxtaposition, and there allowing each to work out its own effect without the production of something novel, is not invention.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Grinnell Washing Mach Company v…

Confessedly all the elements of the Phillips patent are old. The merits of the combination, which it is contended, involve invention and validate the patent, are that this gearing device, applied and operated as specified, enables the washing of a part of the clothes to be performed at the same time that the wringing process is being applied to other clothes.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Grinnell Washing Mach Company v…

No one by bringing together several old devices without producing a new and useful result, the joint product of the elements of the combination and something more than an aggregate of old results, can acquire a right to prevent others from using the same devices, either singly or in other combinations, or, even if a new and useful result is obtained, can prevent others from using some of the devices, omitting others, in combination.' Hailes v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature