Summary

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Krueger v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Krueger was a bona fide purchaser without notice, and as such entitled to hold the land. The Court of Appeals took the same view of the evidence as to the fraudulent manner in which the land was acquired, and reached the conclusion that the patent should be set aside for fraud committed against the United States unless the defendant had shown that she was an innocent purchaser without notice.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Krueger v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Krueger had been chief clerk of the United States Land Office at Denver until February 12, 1907, and thereafter practiced as an attorney in land and mining matters at Denver. Moses procured the soldier's additional homestead right upon which the entry was made, and made the entry at the request of Krueger who had bought the soldier's additional right from Moses for $780. Moses deeded the land to Krueger, and never claimed any interest in it.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature