Summary

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Southern Railway Company v. Josephine King No 140 Southern Railway Company…

Statutes which require the speed of such trains to be checked at all crossings so situated might not only be a regulation, but also a direct burden upon interstate commerce, and therefor beyond the power of the state to enact.
It is the settled law of this court that one who would strike down a state statute as violative of the Federal Constitution must bring himself, by proper averments and showing, within the class as to whom the act thus attacked is unconstitutional.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Southern Railway Company v. Josephine King No 140 Southern Railway Company…

The learned counsel for the petitioner insists that under the decisions in Georgia, in the absence of a special demurrer requiring a more particular statement, the answer was sufficient. It is enough to say that we have examined those decisions, and think that they do not indicate a departure from the general rule that a pleading must state facts, and not mere conclusions, and that the want of definite allegations essential to a cause of action or defense renders a pleading subject to demurrer.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William R. Day William R. Day Southern Railway Company v. Josephine King No 140 Southern Railway Company…

They mean on their face that the requirement that the engineer at every grade crossing should have his train under such control as to be able to stop, if necessary, to avoid running down a man or wagon crossing the track, requires such delays as to prevent, or seriously to interfere with, commerce among the states.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature