Summary

Portrait of William Rehnquist William Rehnquist United States v. Felix — Opinion of the Court (1992)

The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in United States v. Calderone, 917 F.2d 717 (1990) , upheld a claim of double jeopardy by a divided vote, with each judge on the panel writing an opinion interpreting the crucial language from Grady differently. That court decided that the "conduct" at issue in a conspiracy prosecution is not the agreement itself, but the conduct from which the Government asks the jury to infer that there was an agreement.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William Rehnquist William Rehnquist United States v. Felix — Opinion of the Court (1992)

The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: " [N] or shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb."
During the summer of 1987, respondent Frank Dennis Felix operated a facility in Beggs, Oklahoma, at which he manufactured methamphetamine in violation of applicable federal statutes. In July, this facility was raided and shut down by Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature