Summary

by Robert Barclay An Apology for the True Christian Divinity… (1678)

For we firmly believe, That no other foundation can any man lay, than that which is laid already. But that this revelation is necessary we have already proved: and this distinction doth sufficiently guard us against the hazard insinuated in the objection. [19] As to the scriptures being a filled canon I see no necessity of believing it. And if these men, that believe the scriptures to be the only rule, will be consistent with their own doctrine, they must needs be of my judgment; seeing it is simply impossible to prove the canon by the scriptures.
Source: Wikisource

by Robert Barclay An Apology for the True Christian Divinity… (1678)

If the scripture be not the adequate, principal, and only rule, then it would follow that the scripture is not complete, nor the canon felled ; that if men be now immediately led and ruled by the Spirit, they may add new scriptures of equal authority with the old; whereas every one that adds is cursed: yea, what assurance have we, but at this rate every one may bring in a new gospel according to his fancy?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature