by the Supreme Court of Korea, Supreme Court Decision 2006Mo656 Delivered on January 31… (2007 | noyear)
“ But as a legal counsel’s right to meet and communicate with a physically restrained person is the flip side of the right to be assisted by a legal counsel held by a physically restrained person, as guaranteed as one of the basic rights under the Constitution. So, in recognizing that an exercise of the right to meet and communicate has gone beyond the above limit, one shall be prudent not to infringe upon the essence of the right to be assisted by a legal counsel held by a physically restrained person, as guaranteed as one of the basic rights under the Constitution. ”
