Bayezid I

Definition and stakes

Portrait of Herbert Adams Gibbons Herbert Adams Gibbons,  The Foundation of the Ottoman Empire…

“ The great schism in the Western Church, which so aided Murad and Bayezid in laying solidly the foundations of an empire in Europe, was the outcome of the short-sighted and purely selfish policy of these two popes. How far from the truth it is to represent them as courageously, whole-heartedly, and persistently endeavouring to awaken the interest and attention of Europe in the peril from the East! ”
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Herbert Adams Gibbons Herbert Adams Gibbons,  The Foundation of the Ottoman Empire…

“ Hammer, at the beginning of the reign of Bayezid, i. 295-7, relates the history of the quarrel between Andronicus and his father and Manuel, the rescue from the Tower of Anemas, &c., as if these events happened in 1389 and 1390, and gives the capture of Philadelphia for 1391. He has been led astray here by the story of Ducas, and by the fact that the Byzantine historians speak of Bayezid instead of Murad in connexion with the negotiations for restoration. By the internal evidence in the Byzantine historians themselves, the chronology of this period cannot be decided. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Herbert Adams Gibbons Herbert Adams Gibbons,  The Foundation of the Ottoman Empire…

“ They wandered far and sold their services to get established family ties. [680]
There is one more testimony concerning the humble origin of the Ottoman royal house. The different historians of the relations between Timur and Bayezid I all speak of the taunt flung by Timur at Bayezid concerning the Ottoman ruler’s lack of royal ancestors. [681] Bayezid never made any response to this taunt, and confined his boasting, which was by no means of a modest sort, to his own and his father’s achievements, and to his power as a European ruler.
”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature