AI-generated from sources

Fact, feeling, and the elusive nature of importance

In Brief

  • The importance of any event or object is determined by a fundamental tension between internal, subjective feeling and external, objective fact.
  • The subjective perspective, championed by figures like William James, posits that emotional and affective values are the primary arbiters of significance, overriding dispassionate reason in driving human action.
  • The objective perspective, seeking truth in 'outside things,' requires stable, verifiable facts, yet even these facts are ultimately filtered through subjective experience and interpretation.
  • True meaning and importance emerge from a symbiosis where objective facts must be 'felt' to be powerful, and rich feelings must relate to an objective reality to achieve definition and permanence.

What makes something important? Is it an intrinsic quality of an event or object, or a value judgment projected by human consciousness? This question creates a fundamental tension between the internal world of subjective feeling and the external world of objective fact [1]. It forces a confrontation between two distinct modes of valuation: one that finds significance in the intensity of personal experience and another that seeks it in the verifiable, external state of things.

One perspective champions the subjective, positing that a thing's significance is entirely dependent on an observer deeming it so [2]. This view suggests that our emotional and psychological states are the primary arbiters of value, shaping our reality from the inside out [3]. In stark opposition stands the view that prioritizes objective reality, where the fact of a thing's existence and its verifiable properties are what truly matter, regardless of how it is perceived or felt [4]. This framework seeks truth in a correspondence with "outside things," independent of belief [5].

The struggle between these two poles—the tyranny of personal feeling versus the mandate of external fact—is not merely an abstract philosophical debate. It permeates our understanding of truth, morality, and even our own consciousness [6, 7]. Resolving this tension requires examining the very nature of both facts and feelings, questioning whether they are truly separate domains or merely different aspects of a single, complex reality [8].

The Sovereignty of Subjective Experience

The argument for subjectivity's primacy begins with the premise that our conscious experience is fundamentally governed by affective values . It is the emotions things excite and the purposes they serve that organize the flow of our thoughts, effectively deciding what rises to the level of importance . Actions are ultimately controlled by passions like sympathy or justice, not by dispassionate reason, suggesting that feeling is the engine of human behavior [9]. Even our powerful sense of self-importance often stems from a deeply felt anxiety about the opinions of others, a purely subjective concern that drives a vast amount of human endeavor [10].

This perspective extends to profound moral and existential judgments. Even a belief in an objective moral order, something seemingly external and absolute, derives its motivating force from an individual's own subjective feeling . Love, for example, can be proposed as the single most important thing of all, a claim rooted entirely in emotional conviction rather than empirical evidence [11]. Similarly, the profound sense of comfort and identity derived from one's home is an intensely personal feeling, yet it constitutes a vital part of life [12]. These experiences assert their importance through their felt reality, not through external validation.

Philosophically, this view challenges the very distinction between the inner and outer worlds. Consciousness can be understood as a process where the objective and subjective are merely two faces of the same reality [13]. All mental events, from the simplest sensation to the most complex thought, can be seen as both a cognitive grasp of some truth and a subjectively "felt" state [14]. Following this logic, every so-called objective fact is ultimately grounded upon a corresponding subjective experience, as matter itself is only accessible to us as the "Felt" [15, 16].

The Mandate of Objective Fact

In contrast, the case for the supremacy of fact rests on the need for a stable, external reality. Truth, in this framework, cannot be a mere property of belief; it must depend on a relationship with things outside the mind . While subjective elements of experience are undeniably real, they are sometimes considered less important precisely because they are self-contained and do not necessarily point to anything beyond themselves, unlike objective perceptions which connect us to a shared world [17].

Our ability to navigate the world and make useful predictions relies on an understanding of recurring patterns of events—an experience made useful not by momentary feeling, but by the influence of custom and the observation of facts [18]. Intellectual constructs and general laws, while abstract, serve as essential devices that help us manage an otherwise overwhelming flood of immediate, raw experience [19]. Without this reliance on a structured, factual reality, our intelligence would be unable to find direction .

However, the concept of a "fact" is not as solid as it might appear. A fact can be seen as a "pliant, shifting, chameleon-coloured thing," not a dead certainty but a complex set of relations that is always subject to interpretation [20]. What we call scientific knowledge may be little more than recorded impressions of our own experience [21]. Moreover, a belief or a fancy, while subjective, has a real existence as a psychological fact and can acquire enormous practical importance, blurring the line between internal state and external reality [22].

The Symbiosis of Fact and Feeling

The apparent opposition between fact and feeling dissolves upon closer inspection, revealing a deep and necessary codependence. A fact that is not subjectively experienced or "felt" may be inert and powerless to bring peace or motivate action [23]. For a fact to become a meaningful part of our experience, it often needs to be imbued with what has been called a "reality feeling," a subjective tone that confirms its place in our world [24].

This interplay is a core feature of human psychology. We are consistently predisposed to believe that any strong subjective feeling must correspond to an objective reality, treating our internal states as windows onto the world "in itself" . Our feeling attitudes are largely responsible for the subjective value we place on things, making it difficult to consider facts fairly without emotional prejudice [25]. This suggests that our access to the objective world is always filtered through, and colored by, our subjectivity .

The relationship is reciprocal. A rich, substantial feeling requires a correspondingly rich object to give it form and definition [26]. To avoid being merely a fleeting personal whim, a powerful feeling must, in a sense, set itself free from pure subjectivity and attach to something permanent and objective . In art, for instance, the goal is not just to express a fact, but to convey the "sentiment of the thing," which is seen as its true character and beauty [27]. This process demonstrates a fusion where the subjective feeling and the objective fact become inseparable expressions of a single truth.

The quest to measure importance by either fact or feeling alone leads to an impasse. The evidence suggests that neither holds ultimate authority. Instead, importance emerges from the dynamic and inescapable relationship between the subjective mind and the objective world . An objective fact is grounded in a subjective experience, and a meaningful subjective feeling must relate to an object beyond itself . The two are not opposing tyrannies but symbiotic partners in the creation of a meaningful reality.

Ultimately, the human condition may be defined by this perpetual negotiation. We are driven by the subjective force of our own feelings, which provide the impetus for action and the measure of our personal lives . Yet we must navigate a world of external facts and shared realities to survive and communicate . The paradox remains that within the greatest objective importance lies unimportance, and vice versa, suggesting that the search for a single, fixed standard is futile . The true measure of importance lies not in a choice between two poles, but in the intelligent and felt experience of their constant interplay.