Arthur Cayley

Biographical details

Arthur Cayley,  1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

“ It is to be remarked, in regard to the question of solvability by radicals, that not only the coefficients are taken to be arbitrary, but it is assumed that they are represented each by a single letter, or say rather that they are not so expressed in terms of other arbitrary quantities as to make a solution possible. If the coefficients are not all arbitrary, for instance, if some of them are zero, a sextic equation might be of the form x6 + bx4 + cx2 + d = 0, and so be solvable as a cubic ”
Source: Wikisource

Arthur Cayley,  1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 8… (1911)

“ If, to get rid of this arbitrary common factor, we assume that the product of the elements in the dexter diagonal has the coefficient +1, we have a complete definition of the determinant, and it is interesting to show how from these properties, assumed for the definition of the determinant, it at once appears that the determinant is a function serving for the solution of a system of linear equations. ”
Source: Wikisource

Arthur Cayley,  1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

“ But in fact a numerical equation of any order whatever has always a numerical root, and thus numbers (in the foregoing sense, number = quantity of the form α + βi) form (what real numbers do not) a universe complete in itself, such that starting in it we are never led out of it. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature