Adrianne Wadewitz, Anne Ellen Geller, Jon Beasley-Murray

Summary

Adrianne Wadewitz, Anne Ellen Geller, Jon Beasley-Murray Wiki-hacking: Opening up the academy with Wikipedia (2010)

Wikipedia works by consensus. Lamentably, with rare exceptions such as in the composition classroom, students are seldom motivated to re-read and reflect upon their own work. Often they scarcely glance at the comments professors write laboriously on their work. Given that there is usually little or no chance to revise their work, they are interested in the grade, and only the grade. Students seldom learn about the importance of revision. And yet on Wikipedia, revision is (almost) everything: contributors are called editors precisely because their writing is in a constant state of revision.
Source: Wikisource

Adrianne Wadewitz, Anne Ellen Geller, Jon Beasley-Murray Wiki-hacking: Opening up the academy with Wikipedia (2010)

Although Wikipedia aims to be the "sum of all human knowledge", having an article on everything in the world is impossible. As the notability guideline states, "On Wikipedia, notability determines whether a topic merits its own article. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article."
Source: Wikisource

Adrianne Wadewitz, Anne Ellen Geller, Jon Beasley-Murray Wiki-hacking: Opening up the academy with Wikipedia (2010)

And yet, by maintaining allegiance to solitary scholarship and traditional assignments and genres of publication, and by implicitly or explicitly degrading the work of co-authorship, we potentially give up venues such as Wikipedia through which our students—and we ourselves—might be able to collaborate and be challenged, share varied expertise and knowledge, and make contributions to a world of learning inside and outside the academy.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature