Summary

Portrait of Alfred Binet Alfred Binet The Mind and the Brain — Book I: Chapter IVAnswers to some Objections… (1907)

Consequently, it is impossible for us to form a conception of matter in terms of movement, and to explain by the modalities of movement the properties of bodies; for this theory amounts to giving to certain sensations, especially those of the muscular sense, the hegemony over the others. We cannot explain, we have not the right to explain, one sensation by another, and the mechanical theory of matter has simply the value of a symbol.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Alfred Binet Alfred Binet The Mind and the Brain — Book I: Chapter IVAnswers to some Objections… (1907)

Of the external world, we only know our sensations. All the physical properties of matter resolve themselves for us into sensations, present, past, or possible. We may not say that it is by the intermediary, by the means of sensation, that we know these properties, for that would mean that the properties are distinct from the sensations. Objects are to us in reality only aggregates of sensations.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Alfred Binet Alfred Binet The Mind and the Brain — Book I: Chapter IVAnswers to some Objections… (1907)

Those who uphold the direct theory are inspired by Berkeley, who asserts that the sensitive qualities of the body have no existence but in our own minds, and consist really in representative ideas. This doctrine is expressly based on this argument—that thought differs too much in nature from matter for one to be able to suppose any link between these two substances. In this particular, some authors often make an assertion without endeavouring to prove it. They are satisfied with attesting, or even with supposing, that mind can have no consciousness of anything but its own states.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature