Summary

Andrea Wallace A Culture of Copyright — 3. Open GLAM in the UK, and globally (2022)

For example, if we investigate a GLAM’s most open approach, the picture is similar to the UK data discussed in Section 3.2. In total, 82 or 42.1% of UK organisations surveyed publish one or more assets using open licences or public domain tools, contributing a total of 10,487,115 open assets or 14.8% of all global assets (that could be counted via publication platforms) . A total of 113 or 57.9% in the UK GLAM Sample have not yet engaged with open access. This paints a relatively healthy picture of open GLAM for the UK heritage sector.
Source: Wikisource

Andrea Wallace A Culture of Copyright — 3. Open GLAM in the UK, and globally (2022)

Each GLAM uses a mix of policies and practice to publish assets online; some are open, but most are not. Some assets are published due to open access obligations attached to funding; others are due to mandatory open licences or statements imposed by platforms. Although seven organisations have implemented open GLAM as a matter of policy and apply open licences or tools to all eligible collections, their practices vary significantly.
Source: Wikisource

Andrea Wallace A Culture of Copyright — 3. Open GLAM in the UK, and globally (2022)

The large majority of UK open GLAM instances are local and regional organisations.
Data aggregators and external platforms have had a huge impact on open GLAM representation in the UK. Among these, Art UK accounts for 58.8% of all UK open GLAM instances.
The UK's largest holders of cultural collections are not open. A few exceptions make significant contributions in volume.
7 UK GLAMS embrace open access as a matter of policy. 6 take a public domain compliant approach; 1 takes an open compliant approach. All appear to hold back high-resolution assets for commercialisation.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature