Arthur William Holland and Margaret Bryant

Summary

Arthur William Holland and Margaret Bryant 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 5… (1911)

The empire of Charles, however, was not lasting. In spite of his own wonderful genius the seeds of weakness were sown in his lifetime. The church was too powerful, an incipient feudalism was present, and there was no real bond of union between the different races that acknowledged his authority. All the vigilance of the emperor could not restrain the dishonesty and the cupidity of his servants, and no sooner was the strong hand of their ruler removed than they began to acquire territorial power for themselves.
Source: Wikisource

Arthur William Holland and Margaret Bryant 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 5… (1911)

After the conquest of the Saracens and the Saxons, the defeat of the Northmen, and the suppression of the feudal revolts, the emperor abdicated in favour of his son Louis (Le Couronnement Looys, 12th century) . Charles’s harangue to his son is in the best tradition of epic romance. The memory of Roncesvalles haunts him on his death-bed, and at the moment of death he has a vision of Roland.
Source: Wikisource

Arthur William Holland and Margaret Bryant 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 5… (1911)

The legendary Charlemagne and his warriors were endowed with the great deeds of earlier kings and heroes of the Frankish kingdom, for the romancers were not troubled by considerations of chronology. National traditions extending over centuries were grouped round Charlemagne, his father Pippin, and his son Louis. The history of Charles Martel especially was absorbed in the Charlemagne legend. But if Charles’s name was associated with the heroism of his predecessors he was credited with equal readiness with the weaknesses of his successors.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature