Summary

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan Amazon Petroleum Corporation…

I am not unmindful of the argument that the President has the privilege of choice between one standard and another, acting or failing to act according to an estimate of values that is individual and personal. To describe his conduct thus is to ignore the essence of his function. What he does is to inquire into the industrial facts as they exist from time to time.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan Amazon Petroleum Corporation…

You are to consider whether the transportation of oil in excess of the statutory quotas is offensive to one or more of the policies enumerated in section 1, whether the effect of such conduct is to promote unfair competition or to waste the natural resources or to demoralize prices or to increase unemployment or to reduce the purchasing power of the workers of the nation. If these standards or some of them have been flouted with the result of a substantial obstruction to industrial recovery, you may then by a prohibitory order eradicate the mischief.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan Amazon Petroleum Corporation…

If legislative power is delegated subject to a condition, it is a requirement of constitutional government that the condition be fulfilled. In default of such fulfillment, there is in truth no delegation, and hence no official action, but only the vain show of it. The analogy is remote between power so conditioned and that in controversy here.
Discretionary action does not become subject to review because the discretion is legislative rather than executive.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature