Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer McCullough v. Virginia — Opinion of the Court

Of what use would the appellate power be to the litigant who feels himself aggrieved by some particular state legislation, if this court could not decide, independently of all adjudication by the supreme court of a state, whether or not the phraseology of the instrument in controversy was expressive of a contract, and within the protection of the constitution of the United States, and that its obligation should be enforced, notwithstanding a contrary conclusion by the supreme court of a state?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer McCullough v. Virginia — Opinion of the Court

Justice Field: 'A contract was thus consummated between the state and the holders of the new bonds and the holders of the coupons, from the obligations of which she could not, without their consent, release herself by any subsequent legislation. She thus bound herself, not only to pay the bonds when they became due, but to receive the interest coupons from the bearer at and after their maturity, to their full amount, for any taxes or dues by him to the state.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer McCullough v. Virginia — Opinion of the Court

The writ of error to the court of appeals of the state brought the validity of that judgment into review, and the question presented to that court was whether, at the time it was rendered, it was rightful or not. If rightful, the plaintiff therein had a vested right, which no state legislation could disturb. It is not within the power of a legislature to take away rights which have been once vested by a judgment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature