Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Gilbertville Trucking Company v…

There is little question that divestiture is within the scope of the Commission's power since, with respect to a § 5 (4) violation, it may order any party to 'take such action as may be necessary, in the opinion of the Commission, to prevent continuance of such violation.' § 5 (7) . Where the unlawful control is the result of an acquisition, divestiture may be the only effective remedy. However, as § 5 (7) itself implies, the Commission's power is corrective, not punitive. The justification for the remedy is the removal of the violation.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Gilbertville Trucking Company v…

To approve a merger in the face of a § 5 (4) violation may encourage others whose merger may or may not be consistent with the public interest to either present the Commission with a fait accompli or avoid its jurisdiction altogether. As the Commission pointed out in Central of Georgia, if such practices were encouraged, 'our administration of the statute in the public interest would be seriously hindered, if not defeated.' 307 I.C.C., at 44.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Gilbertville Trucking Company v…

While it is not unusual for independent carriers to share terminal facilities, as indeed Gilbertville and Nelson do with unrelated carriers in New York and Woonsocket, the repetition of such practices throughout their respective systems makes their alleged independence suspect. When these practices are then supplemented by further day-to-day practices integrating business, equipment, and managerial policies, the Commission is justified in concluding the carriers are in fact being managed and controlled in a common interest.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature