Summary

Portrait of George Saintsbury George Saintsbury 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 22… (1911)

But there is a higher game of criticism than this, and this game Racine does not attempt to play. He does not even attempt the highest poetry at all. His greatest achievements in pure passion-the foiled desires of Hermione and the jealous frenzy of Phédre-are cold, not merely beside the crossed love of Ophelia and the remorse of Lady Macbeth, but beside the sincerer if less perfectly expressed passion of Corneille’s Cléopatre and Camille. In men’s parts he fails still more completely.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Saintsbury George Saintsbury 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 22… (1911)

He had besides a real and saving vein of truth to nature, which preserved him from tricks pure and simple. He would be, and he was, as much a poet as prevalent taste would let him be. The result is that such plays as Phédre and Andromaque are supreme in their own way. If the critic will only abstain from thrusting in tierce, when according to the particular rules he ought to thrust in quart, Racine is sure to beat him.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Saintsbury George Saintsbury 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 22… (1911)

But Mademoiselle du Pat, who played Andromache, had generally been thought below, not above, her parts, and Mademoiselle des Oeillets, who played the difficult role of Hermione, was old and had few physical advantages. No one who reads Andromaque without prejudice is likely to mistake the secret of its success, which is, in few words, the application of the most delicate art to the conception of really tragic passion. Before leaving the play it may be mentioned that it is said to have been in the part of Hermione, three years later, that Mademoiselle de Champmeslé captivated the author.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature