Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Ward v. Cochran — Opinion of the Court

The verdict of a jury is either general or special. A general verdict is that by which they pronounce generally upon all or any of the issues, either in favor of the plaintiff or defendant. A special verdict is that by which the jury finds the facts only. It must present the facts as established by the evidence, and not the evidence to prove them, and they must be so presented as that nothing remains to the court but to draw from them conclusions of law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Ward v. Cochran — Opinion of the Court

Tested by these definitions, it is obvious that if the title relied on in this case by the defendant below was fully described and characterized by the special verdict, it was defective in two very essential particulars in that it was not found to have been actual and exclusive. A possession not actual, but constructive; not exclusive, but in participation with the owner or others, falls very far short of that kind of adverse possession which deprives the true owner of his title.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature