Hastings Rashdall

Hastings Rashdall

John Huss (1879)

Summary

Portrait of Hastings Rashdall Hastings Rashdall,  John Huss (1879)

“ To inveigh against the Fathers of Constance for sending a heretic to the stake, would indeed be to judge of the conduct of one age by the standard of another. But that is not the crime which has fixed upon the memory of the Council, and of the Church which it represented, a stain which can never be wiped off so long as that Church calls herself infallible. Huss was condemned for heresies certainly, but also for opinions which do not affect religious belief at all, for opinions which he had never held, for opinions which no one could seriously have believed that he had held. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hastings Rashdall Hastings Rashdall,  John Huss (1879)

“ Though he was a man of honour, and his conscience long remained ill at ease on the subject, Sigismund was a devout Churchman; and if ever superstition can be pleaded in palliation of a breach of the moral law, surely it can be pleaded on behalf of one who yields to the express commands of an authority which he believes to be infallible. That faith must not be kept with heretics to the prejudice of the Catholic faith, was and is as much a doctrine of the Roman Church [1] as the doctrine of Transubstantiation or of the Immaculate Conception. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature