Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Holmes v. Hurst — Opinion of the Court

If an author permit his intellectual production to be published either serially or collectively, his right to a copyright is lost as effectually as the right of an inventor to a patent upon an invention which he deliberately abandons to the public, and this, too, irrespective of his actual intention not to make such abandonment. It is the intellectual production of the author which the copyright protects, and not the particular form which such production ultimately takes
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown Holmes v. Hurst — Opinion of the Court

The right thus secured by the copyright act is not a right to the use of certain words, because they are the common property of the human race, and are as little susceptible of private appropriation as air or sunlight; nor is it the right to ideas alone, since in the absence of means of communicating them they are of value to no one but the author.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature