Summary

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown,  Kinkead v. United States — Opinion of the Court

“ The truth is, the powers of the commissioners were simply ministerial, and the making of inventories simply a matter of convenience, and a method of determining prima facie what property the government should appropriate to itself for the time being, and what should be left to the individual proprietors. To treat this inventory as binding, either upon the government or individuals, would be to acknowledge that the commissioners were invested with judicial powers to determine the title to property. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown Henry Billings Brown,  Kinkead v. United States — Opinion of the Court

“ It appeared that the territory of Alaska had, prior to its cession to the United States, been occupied by a Russian corporation known as the Russian-American Company, a corporation largely engaged in fur trading. This company had the privilege of making use of the public lands and erecting buildings thereon. It had no right, however, of becoming the owner of such lands, but did have the privilege of conveying parcels of it in fee simple to its employes. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature