Summary

Henry M. Robert Pocket Manual of Rules of Order for Deliberative Assemblies (1876)

The object of Rules of Order is to assist an assembly to accomplish the work for which it was designed, in the best possible manner. To do this it is necessary to restrain the individual somewhat, as the right of an individual in any community, to do what he pleases, is incompatible with the interests of the whole. Where there is no law, but every man does what is right in his own eyes, there is the least of real liberty.
Source: Wikisource

Henry M. Robert Pocket Manual of Rules of Order for Deliberative Assemblies (1876)

Some societies prohibit a question from being taken from the table, except by a two-thirds vote. This rule deprives the society of the advantages of the motion ‘‘to lie on the table,’’ because it would not be safe to lay a question aside temporarily, if one-third of the assembly were opposed to the measure, as that one-third could prevent its ever being taken from the table. A bare majority should not have the power, in ordinary societies, to adopt or reject a question, or prevent its consideration, without debate.
Source: Wikisource

Henry M. Robert Pocket Manual of Rules of Order for Deliberative Assemblies (1876)

On account of the immense amount of business to be transacted during each session by the National House of Representatives, and the large number of members each one of whom is entitled to the floor in debate for one hour, it seems an absolute necessity for them to permit a majority to limit or cut off entirely the debate, and thus practically to suspend one of the fundamental rules of deliberative bodies. This is the more necessary in Congress because the party lines are strictly drawn, and the minority could almost stop legislation if they could prevent the debate from being cut off.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature