Summary

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black United States v. Jacobs — Opinion of the Court

By virtue of this feudal fiction of complete ownership in each of two persons, the surviving tenant by the entirety is conceived to be the recipient of all the property upon the death of the co-tenant, and therefore-it is said-all the property can be taxed.
The constitutionality of an exercise of the taxing power of Congress is not to be determined by such shadowy and intricate distinctions of common law property concepts and ancient fictions.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black United States v. Jacobs — Opinion of the Court

Had the tenancy not been created, this survivorship and change of ownership would not have taken place, but the tax does not operate retroactively merely because some of the facts or conditions upon which its application depends came into being prior to the enactment of the tax. [5]
Death duties or excises imposed upon the occasion of change in legal relationships to property brought about by death are ancient in origin. [6] Congress has the power to levy a tax upon the occasion of a joint tenant's acquiring the status of survivor at the death of a co-tenant.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Hugo Black Hugo Black United States v. Jacobs — Opinion of the Court

There are marked differences between a tenancy by the entireties and a joint tenancy in respect of the power of one tenant to destroy the joint estate, to transfer or encumber his interest and otherwise obtain the fruits of it. In order to prevent evasion Congress may include the value of the entire estate in the gross estate as a measure of the tax where the estate originates after adoption of the law.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature