Summary

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Nichols v. Coolidge — Opinion of the Court

Coolidge to trustees was in no proper sense testamentary, and it bears no substantial relationship to the transfer by death. The mere desire to equalize taxation cannot justify a burden on something not within congressional power. The language of the statute is not consistent with the idea that it utilizes the gross estate merely to measure a proper charge upon the transfer by death.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Nichols v. Coolidge — Opinion of the Court

The right to become beneficially entitled is not the occasion for it. There is no claim that the transfers were made in contemplation of death or with purpose to evade taxation. The provision applicable in such circumstances is not relied on and the extent of congressional power to prevent evasion or defeat of duly imposed exactions need not be discussed.
Certainly Congress may lay an excise upon the transfer of property by death reckoned upon the value of the interest which passes thereby.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of James Clark McReynolds James Clark McReynolds Nichols v. Coolidge — Opinion of the Court

If any part of the gross estate consists of proceeds of policies of insurance upon the life of the decedent receivable by a beneficiary other than the executor, the executor shall be entitled to recover from such beneficiary such portion of the total tax paid as the proceeds, in excess of $40,000, of such policies bear to the net estate. If there is more than one such beneficiary the executor shall be entitled to recover from such beneficiaries in the same ratio.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature