Summary

Portrait of John G. Koeltl John G. Koeltl Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v…

In the circumstances of this case, the difficulty of an effective author's agreement for each article in a periodical supports the publisher's interest in being able to enjoin systematic, wholesale infringement of the articles that appear in its publication. The defendants argue that the Russian law has effectively created a massive loophole through which they can drive their publication. Author's agreements cannot cover future articles and the publishers cannot protect less than their entire publication, they argue.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John G. Koeltl John G. Koeltl Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v…

He testified that his opinion was that a publisher's right in a work as a whole should be deemed to be infringed whenever the allegedly infringing activity is sufficient to interfere with the publisher's interest in the integrity of the work, and that as against a third party infringer, rather than the author of an article, the newspaper would have sufficient interest to prevent such infringement.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John G. Koeltl John G. Koeltl Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v…

Article 9, P 1 of the Russian Federation Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights sets forth the basic principle that, "A scientific, literary or artistic work is eligible for copyright by virtue of the mere fact of its creation. The origin and [**17] exercise of copyright shall not require either registration of the work or the performance of any other act or formality." Although no registration or use of copyright sign is necessary to acquire rights to a work, the plaintiffs demonstrated that copyright notices were present.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature