John Marshall Harlan II,
Haynes v. United States (390 U.S. 85…
“ It is true, as the United States emphasizes, that registration is not invariably indicative of a violation of the Act's requirements; there are situations, which the United States itself styles 'uncommon,' [10] in which a possessor who has not violated the Act's other provisions is obliged to register. [11] Nonetheless, the correlation between obligations to register violations can only be regarded as exceedingly high, and a prospective registrant realistically can expect that registration will substantially increase the likelihood of his prosecution. ”
