Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II,  United States v. Fabrizio — Opinion of the Court

“ No plausible legislative purpose would be served by the Government's construction, for when an individual takes an acknowledgment of purchase home from New Hampshire, merely retaining it as a personal record of his purchase, the antigambling policies of other States are in no way undermined, and no opening is provided for the growth of organized racketeering. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II,  United States v. Fabrizio — Opinion of the Court

“ Appellee emphasizes the congressional desire to attack organized crime, a purpose not served by restrictions on the distribution of New Hampshire Sweepstakes materials. Appellee argues that the specific exemption in § 1953 (b) of certain legal gambling enterprises from the provisions of § 1953 (a) and the limitation of § 1953 (a) itself to three types of gambling favored by organized crime reflect a congressional policy of respecting the individual gambling policies of the States and that these exemptions and limitations are merely indicative of that general policy. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature