Summary

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II United States v. Fabrizio — Opinion of the Court

No plausible legislative purpose would be served by the Government's construction, for when an individual takes an acknowledgment of purchase home from New Hampshire, merely retaining it as a personal record of his purchase, the antigambling policies of other States are in no way undermined, and no opening is provided for the growth of organized racketeering.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of John Marshall Harlan II John Marshall Harlan II United States v. Fabrizio — Opinion of the Court

Appellee emphasizes the congressional desire to attack organized crime, a purpose not served by restrictions on the distribution of New Hampshire Sweepstakes materials. Appellee argues that the specific exemption in § 1953 (b) of certain legal gambling enterprises from the provisions of § 1953 (a) and the limitation of § 1953 (a) itself to three types of gambling favored by organized crime reflect a congressional policy of respecting the individual gambling policies of the States and that these exemptions and limitations are merely indicative of that general policy.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature