Summary

John McLean United States v. Buford — Opinion of the Court

If the money of the United States is advanced by one agent of the government to another, this is prima facie, by necessary implication, an advance to the use of the government. In the case before the court, by the terms of the receipt given by the defendant, this is shown; as the receipt acknowledges the money to have been paid by James Morrison, 'deputy quarter master general of the United States,' to Thomas Buford, 'deputy commissary general;' and promises to account for the same.
Source: Wikisource

John McLean United States v. Buford — Opinion of the Court

If they are, the defendant must go without day.
The declaration, whether it must be considered as general or special, is a statement of a debt due to Morrison, and assigned to the United States, and the pleas allege that if the debt existed, it is barred by the statute of limitations, and there is no claim. This is not met by the United States. They do not traverse this, and thus put it in issue; nor do they traverse the defendant's allegation which is made, that the transaction with Morrison was private. The replication is therefore defective.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature