Summary

John Timperley An Account of the Harbour and Docks at Kingston-upon-Hull (1842)

If there are many large vessels to pass, it is sometimes found necessary to draw off the water one or two feet, so that the surface on the two sides may become level sooner, and the gates continue longer open, of which advantage is also taken to pass craft without the labour and delay of lockage ; but this practice is never resorted to, except in cases of necessity, as the deposit of mud in the dock is much increased by it, the water abstracted, which is comparatively pure from time having been allowed for subsidence, being replaced by the very muddy water of the tide.
Source: Wikisource

John Timperley An Account of the Harbour and Docks at Kingston-upon-Hull (1842)

This was observed in a variety of places, and it was not uncommon to see the mortar in one part of the wall exceedingly hard and good, and within a few inches from it, where the wall was open and the water had found its way, quite soft and bad, or but little harder than when first built. From this we see how essential it is, that building in water should have a substantial and immoveable foundation, and that the walls should be completely solid and impervious, particularly where a good water lime cannot easily be obtained.
Source: Wikisource

John Timperley An Account of the Harbour and Docks at Kingston-upon-Hull (1842)

In variable ground it is not to be expected that all the piles can be equally well driven ; but it may be stated, that the only yielding observed in the whole of this work, was at the projecting comers of the locks adjoining the dock wall, where a small crack, about the thickness of a knife blade, or little more, appeared for a few courses below the coping, caused, as it is believed, not by the sinking of the piles, but by the lateral pressure of the earth behind, on a part which from its construction is necessarily weak.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature