Summary

Joseph N. Teal State vs. National Control of Public Forests from the viewpoint of a western state (1913)

In the interests of the whole people we submit that this great resource should remain public property, used and controlled in the interest of the public, and all who believe this should resist all attempts in whatever guise they appear, to transfer the national forests to the states, as the first step towards a complete private monopoly of the forests, and the first gun of a direct attack upon true conservation.
Source: Wikisource

Joseph N. Teal State vs. National Control of Public Forests from the viewpoint of a western state (1913)

To do this, we do not believe the interest of the public should be deliberately sacrificed under the guise of development or under the temptation for immediate personal gain. The forests are a public asset, a public resource.' They fill a function in nature's plan, that necessarily not only now but always will be important in the orderly and growing life of our nation. They will not only serve, if conserved, to furnish forever a never failing source of supply of lumber, but under God's providence serve even more useful purposes in other directions.
Source: Wikisource

Joseph N. Teal State vs. National Control of Public Forests from the viewpoint of a western state (1913)

From a selfish standpoint, if from no higher motive, as citizens of this state directly interested in its speedy development, it favors the widest and wisest use of our natural resources. It believes all agricultural land should be open to the settler, and every encouragement given the prospector. It believes in maintaining in every possible way the greatest possible opportunity to the individual striving to better his condition.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature