Summary

Portrait of Joseph Rucker Lamar Joseph Rucker Lamar Kreitlein v. Ferger — Opinion of the Court

When it is considered that the schedule must not only include claims of recent origin, but debts which have accrued many years before, and where the creditor may have changed his residence, it becomes evident that to lay down the general rule that the schedule must give the name of the creditor and the city and street number of the residence of those living in the largest cities would, in a multitude of cases, destroy the beneficent effect of the bankruptcy act.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Joseph Rucker Lamar Joseph Rucker Lamar Kreitlein v. Ferger — Opinion of the Court

Of a like nature, and to be governed by the same principle, is the contention that, even if C. Ferger is a sufficient listing of the name, the schedule was fatally defective because it failed to give the street and number of his residence in Indianapolis. This objection is more difficult of solution than any of the others presented by this record. But, like them, must be considered in the light of the fact that the statute was intended for business men, and should receive not only a practical but a uniform construction.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature