Summary

Louis Engel A Dictionary of Music and Musicians (1900)

That Thalberg, like De Beriot, once took a grand motif of Beethoven and distorted it into 'effective variations,' enraged Schumann, as it must every true musician. His was a certain mission: elegance and effect; to pour a rain of rosebuds and pink diamonds into the eager listener's ear and enchant him for the moment—no more.
It is interesting to learn the opinion of two great authorities both in piano and composition, viz. Mendelssohn and Rubinstein, on the relative merits of Liszt and Thalberg.
Source: Wikisource

Louis Engel A Dictionary of Music and Musicians (1900)

You, if you cannot charm the audience, can at least astonish and crush them.' Mendelssohn continues, in his comparison of the two men, that Liszt's compositions are beneath his performance, since above all 'he lacks ideas of his own, all his writing aiming only at showing off his virtuosity, whereas Thalberg's "Donna del lago," for instance, is a work of the most brilliant effect, with an astonishing gradual increase of difficulties and ornamentation, and refined taste in every bar. His paw (Faust) is as remarkable as the light deftness of his fingers.
Source: Wikisource

Louis Engel A Dictionary of Music and Musicians (1900)

Thalberg had one thing in view, and that only—to find new forms, new effects, new surprises for the public. Schumann says that in this fantasia Thalberg reminds him of Goethe's saying:—'Happy are those who by their birth are lifted beyond the lower stratum of humanity, and who need not pass through those conditions in which many a good man anxiously passes his whole life' (G. S. ii. 66) .
Thalberg had the great art of composing works much more difficult in appearance than in reality.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature