Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar

Summary

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar New York Company v. Winter's Admistrator…

While it may be admitted, as a general rule, that the contract between the passenger and the railroad company is made up of the ticket which he purchases and the rules and regulations of the road, yet it does not follow that parol evidence of what was said between the passenger and the ticket seller from whom he purchased his ticket, at the time of such purchase, is inadmissible, as going to make up the contract of carriage, and forming a part of it.
Source: Wikisource

Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar New York Company v. Winter's Admistrator…

Under the circumstances of the case, as testified to by the plaintiff, the conductor of the first train was derelict in his duty in not providing the passenger with a stop-over check when the latter stated to him that he desired to stop off at Olean, (as he had the right to do,) if such check was necessary to enable the passenger to complete his journey to Salamanca. If the jury believed the evidence of the plaintiff in this matter, they were justified in finding negligence on the part of the first conductor.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature