Martin Theodoor Houtsma

Summary

Martin Theodoor Houtsma Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1888)

To the former, as also to the Arabs, it has a collective sense like Scythians or Huns; [1] at the present day we are wont to restrict the name to the Osmanli Turks, though they themselves refuse to be called Turks, having, as they hold, ceased to be such in becoming imbued with Arabo-Persian culture. On the other hand, when we speak of Uigurs and Tatars, we mean tribes who style themselves Turks and really are such. It is only by the aid of historical and linguistical evidence that we can determine the true limits of the Turkish name.
Source: Wikisource

Martin Theodoor Houtsma Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1888)

Ethnological affinities. But, though Turkish tribes did wander so far to the west, and even farther, in remote antiquity, it seems pretty certain that the Uigurian tradition has preserved the memory of the true origin of the race, that Turks and Mongols were originally different stems of a single people, and that these two members of the Ural-Altaic (q.v.) family were more closely related to each other than to any other member of the same family (Finnollgrians, Samoyedes, Tungus-Manchus) .
Source: Wikisource

Martin Theodoor Houtsma Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition (1888)

The Turkmans are, with few exceptions, nomads, and were formerly the terror of their neighbours, who feared them as the "man-stealing Turks"; but since Merv has been annexed to Russia (1884) they have been compelled to abandon their predatory habits. [15] (VI.) The Turkish nomads scattered throughout Persia are partly the descendants of the Ghuzz tribes that invaded the country at the Seljukian period; others have migrated thither in the following centuries.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature