Summary

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Wolf v. Stix (99 U.S. 1) — Opinion of the Court

The purchaser does not subject himself to a liability to pay to creditors the value of what he buys. All the risk he runs is that the sale may be avoided, and the property reclaimed for their benefit. To come within this exception in the Bankrupt Act the debt must be created by fraud. The debt of Wolf in this case was not created by his purchase of the goods, but by his bond to pay their value if he failed to sustain his title.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Morrison Waite Morrison Waite Wolf v. Stix (99 U.S. 1) — Opinion of the Court

Stat., provides that 'no discharge shall release, discharge, or affect any person liable for the same debt for or with the bankrupt, either as partner, joint contractor, indorser, surety, or otherwise.' The cases are numerous in which it has been held, and we think correctly, that if one is bound as surety for another to pay any judgment that may be rendered in a specified action, if the judgment is defeated by the bankruptcy of the person for whom the obligation is assumed, the surety will be released.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature