Summary

Murray Newton Rothbard Anatomy of the State — How the State Transcends Its Limits (1974)

In short, Calhoun does not push his path-breaking theory on concurrence far enough: hedoes not push it down to the individual himself. If the individual, after all, is the one whose rights are to be protected, then a consistent theory of concurrence would imply veto power by every individual; that is, some form of “unanimity principle.” When Calhoun wrote that it should be “impossible to put or to keep it [the government] in action without the concurrent consent of all,” he was, perhaps unwittingly, implying just such a conclusion.
Source: Wikisource

Murray Newton Rothbard Anatomy of the State — How the State Transcends Its Limits (1974)

Certainly the most ambitious attempt to impose limits on the State has been the Bill of Rights and other restrictive parts of the American Constitution, in which written limits on government became the fundamental law to be interpreted by a judiciary supposedly independent of the other branches of government. All Americans are familiar with the process by which the construction of limits in the Constitution has been inexorably broadened over the last century.
Source: Wikisource

Murray Newton Rothbard Anatomy of the State — How the State Transcends Its Limits (1974)

Thus, the State has invariably shown a striking talent for the expansion of its powers beyond any limits that might be imposed upon it. Since the State necessarily lives by the compulsory confiscation of private capital, and since its expansion necessarily involves ever-greater incursions on private individuals and private enterprise, we must assert that the State is profoundly and inherently anticapitalist.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature