Summary

Once a Week, New Series, Volume VII… (1871)

“ It is thus established that a modern juror is the very opposite of the old jury man: for the one entered upon a trial, in all cases, with a knowledge of the facts of the case; the other, as a rule, knows no thing of them until they are disclosed in evidence. And this knowledge possessed by the old jurors was a matter of necessity. Take the case, for example, of a small village nowadays. Everybody knows everybody else’s business; and, if the men of the village tried the criminal themselves, ignorance of facts and freedom from prejudice would be alike impossible. ”
Source: Wikisource

Once a Week, New Series, Volume VII… (1871)

“ Perhaps we should rather say that our remarks would take the form of a speculation about the origin and growth of trial by jury; for of the early history of this method of deciding disputed questions of fact, very little is known accurately. In our research, we soon get into the far-back ages of fog and mist, where history gropes her way with faltering and uncertain step. There is, in fact, no means of discovering when trial by jury began in England. ”
Source: Wikisource

Once a Week, New Series, Volume VII… (1871)

“ Appearing duly equipped for his aerial journey, one fine morning, on the top of a little promontory, “ he waved his pinions a while to gather air, then leaped from his stand, and in an instant dropped into the lake: ” whence the Prince Rasselas pulled him out, “half dead with terror and vexation.” We shall never have wings we can fly with, nor balloons that we can guide through the ocean of air; therefore, we must content ourselves as best we may without them. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature