Pearson Choate

Summary

Pearson Choate The King Who Went on Strike (1924)

A half-hearted man! What a faculty Uncle Bond had for hitting on a phrase, a sentence, that stuck, that recurred. It described him. A half-hearted King. A half-hearted friend. A half-hearted—lover.
But was it altogether his fault? Was it not his position, his intolerable isolation, his responsibility, which, by a bitter paradox, was without responsibility, that had thrown his whole life out of gear, and paralysed his will? As a sailor, in his own chosen profession, with responsibility, with the command of men, he had held his own, more than held his own, with his peers.
Source: Gutenberg

Pearson Choate The King Who Went on Strike (1924)

The Duke was his servant. In intimate, familiar talk, he never failed to call him "sir." The Duke must be his friend. His friend? A King could have no friends. A man apart, isolated, lonely, and remote, as his father had always been, a King was condemned to live alone.
A sudden, unbearable sense of loneliness, a terror of himself, a terror of this new, isolated, remote life, in which he was to be denied even the poor palliative of friendship, swept over the King. He had longed to be alone. He had come up, out here, on to the palace roof, to be alone.
Source: Gutenberg

Pearson Choate The King Who Went on Strike (1924)

The anger of the crowd was hideous, menacing. The line of the military, and the police, between the crowd and the palace tossed up and down, like a line of corks on a wild, tempestuous sea. At any moment, that line might break, and the infuriated mob would be let loose, with its madness, its lust for blood, its wild shouting for lynch law.
Anything might happen, at any moment, unless something was done, and done quickly.
And he was the man who must take action—
Without haste, surely, and skilfully, the King climbed on to the stone parapet of the balcony.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature