Summary

Portrait of Potter Stewart Potter Stewart Stanford v. Texas — Opinion of the Court

No less a standard could be faithful to First Amendment freedoms. The constitutional impossibility of leaving the protection of those freedoms to the whim of the officers charged with executing the warrant is dramatically underscored by what the officers saw fit to seize under the warrant in this case. [17]
"The requirement that warrants shall particularly describe the things to be seized makes general searches under them impossible and prevents the seizure of one thing under a warrant describing another.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature