Summary

Richard A. Hook An Experimental Translocation of the Eastern Timber Wolf

Whatever the explanation, the wolves did survive what seemed to be their most vulnerable period. We do not believe that the deaths of the wolves can be attributed to the conditions of their translocations. Instead, we think that the most important factor in their demise was the accessibility of the area to human beings and the attitudes of humans towards wolves.
As indicated earlier, there appears to be an inverse relationship between human density and wolf density in the Great Lakes Region (Table 1) . Wolves are vulnerable to both accidental and deliberate mortality from humans.
Source: Gutenberg

Richard A. Hook An Experimental Translocation of the Eastern Timber Wolf

The reason for the failure of the experimental wolves to re-establish themselves was direct mortality by human beings, just as Hendrickson et al. (1975) concluded was the case for the failure of native and immigrant Michigan wolves to re-establish a population. This mortality probably is related to two factors, negative human attitudes toward wolves and accessibility of humans to wolf range.
Source: Gutenberg

Richard A. Hook An Experimental Translocation of the Eastern Timber Wolf

The human population of the Upper Peninsula is 303,342, with a rural density of about 9.0 persons per square mile or 3.5 persons per square kilometer (Table 1) . The population of the Upper Peninsula has remained at about 300,000 for the past 50 years, and the rural human populations of local areas have generally declined or remained stable. During those 50 years, the wolf population has declined from several hundred animals to near extinction, with the population estimated by Hendrickson et al. (1975) at 6 to 10 remaining wolves.
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature