Summary

Portrait of Robert Boyle Robert Boyle The Sceptical Chymist — Physiological Considerations

And I shall proceed to consider the testimony of Experience, when I shall have first advertis'd You, that if Men were as perfectly rational as 'tis to be wish'd they were, this sensible way of Probation would be as needless as 'tis wont to be imperfect. For it is much more high and Philosophical to discover things a priore, then a posteriore. And therefore the Peripateticks have not been very sollicitous to gather Experiments to prove their Doctrine, contenting themselves with a few only, to satisfie those that are not capable of a Nobler Conviction.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Robert Boyle Robert Boyle The Sceptical Chymist — Physiological Considerations

And I should have much stronger Expectations then I dare yet entertain, to see Philosophy solidly establish't , if men would more carefully distinguish those things that they know, from those that they ignore or do but think, and then explicate clearly the things they conceive they understand, acknowledge ingenuously what it is they ignore, and profess so candidly their Doubts, that the industry of intelligent persons might be set on work to make further enquiries, and the easiness of less discerning Men might not be impos'd on.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Robert Boyle Robert Boyle The Sceptical Chymist — Physiological Considerations

Philosophers, having their eyes darken'd, and their Brains troubl'd with the smoke of their own Furnaces, began to rail at the Peripatetick Doctrine, which they were too illiterate to understand, and to tell the credulous World, that they could see but three Ingredients in mixt Bodies ; which to gain themselves the repute of Inventors, they endeavoured to disguise by calling them, instead of Earth, and Fire, and Vapour, Salt, Sulphur, and Mercury
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature