Summary

Portrait of Salmon P. Chase Salmon P. Chase Veazie Bank v. Fenno — Opinion of the Court

The power to tax may be exercised oppressively upon persons, but the responsibility of the legislature is not to the courts, but to the people by whom its members are elected. So if a particular tax bears heavily upon a corporation, or a class of corporations, it cannot, for that reason only, be pronounced contrary to the Constitution.
But there is another answer which vindicates equally the wisdom and the power of Congress.
It cannot be doubted that under the Constitution the power to provide a circulation of coin is given to Congress.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Salmon P. Chase Salmon P. Chase Veazie Bank v. Fenno — Opinion of the Court

It would undoubtedly be an abuse of the power if so exercised as to impair the separate existence and independent self-government [13] of the States, or if exercised for ends inconsistent with the limited grants of power in the Constitution.
And there are directions as to the mode of exercising the power. If Congress sees fit to impose a capitation, or other direct tax, it must be laid in proportion to the census; if Congress determines to impose duties, imposts, and excises, they must be uniform throughout the United States. These are not strictly limitations of power.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Salmon P. Chase Salmon P. Chase Veazie Bank v. Fenno — Opinion of the Court

In the course of this examination he said:
'Whether direct taxes, in the sense of the Constitution, comprehend any other tax than a capitation tax, and tax on land, is a questionable point. If Congress, for instance, should tax, in the aggregate or mass, things that generally pervade all the States in the Union, then, perhaps, the rule of apportionment would be the most proper, especially if an assessment was to intervene.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature