Summary

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Pacific Insurance Company v. Soule…

But an income tax can be apportioned as easily as any other direct tax; first, by determining the amount to be raised from incomes throughout the United States, and then by ascertaining the proportion to be paid by the people of each State. An income tax, in the matter of its apportionment, is not embarrassed by any other difficulties than those which grow out of apportionment, in the admitted cases of poll taxes and land taxes.
It was clearly the object of the act, to compel parties to pay the legal percentage on their incomes, estimating them at their value in legal tender currency.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Pacific Insurance Company v. Soule…

Indeed, it is obvious that an income tax, levied on the profits of any business, does not fall ultimately on the consumer or patron of that business, in any other sense than that in which a poll tax or land tax may be said ultimately to fall, or be charged over by the payer of those taxes upon the persons with whom and for whom they do business, or to whom they rent their lands.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Noah Haynes Swayne Noah Haynes Swayne Pacific Insurance Company v. Soule…

It has been held that Congress may require direct taxes to be laid and collected in the Territories as well as in the States. [14]
The consequences which would follow the apportionment of the tax in question among the States and Territories of the Union, in the manner prescribed by the Constitution, must not be overlooked. They are very obvious. Where such corporations are numerous and rich, it might be light; where none exist, it could not be collected; where they are few and poor, it would fall upon them with such weight as to involve annihilation.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature