Summary

Samuel Blatchford Electric Gas-Lighting Company v…

In an apparatus for lighting gas by electricity, two wires through which currents of electricity are passed, each wire electrically connected with the same electro-magnet, attracting an armature, which armature actuates mechanism operating automaticaly to turn on the gas and light the same by an electric spark or sparks at the tip of the gas-burner, and also to turn off the gas and extinguish the light.
Source: Wikisource

Samuel Blatchford Electric Gas-Lighting Company v…

In apparatus of the second class, there is only a single electric impulse, and a rocking-gas valve is turned in one direction to let on the gas, and in the reverse direction to extinguish it. There are two electro-magnets, but no ratchet-wheel or pawl, and no gas-cock rotating always in the same direction, and no switching mechanism or equivalent therefor, because the apparatus is adapted and intended to light only one burner, and not a series of burners.
Source: Wikisource

Samuel Blatchford Electric Gas-Lighting Company v…

Thus, without the pawl or ratchet-wheel or some equivalent, the vibratory movement of the break-piece or interrupter could not be utilized to turn the gas on and off when required, and without the cam-wheels, levers, etc., controlling the circuits, the turning on and off device would be useless, because it would not be under control, but would go on turning the gas on and off in rapid succession, and leave it either on or off, as chance might determine, when the current was cut off at the lighting station.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature