Summary

Scriptorium/Archives/2011-05

“ I see linking to portals is primarily a header issue, though we have extended that in the last proposal where we may have done work and research on a person or topic (that is not an author, and not a work) . So I would not be linking to the portal namespace solely to add to portal visibility from the body of a work, and if a portal is under-developed, I probably wouldn't link there unless it had high relevance. ”
Source: Wikisource

Scriptorium/Archives/2011-05

“ For us, I believe that the purpose of a link is to link to something of definite value to the work (or adding context to the work) and unambiguous in its intent, eg. to an author page, or to a work, (onsite - easy decisions) , or maybe to an archaic word at wikt (offsite, and some interpretation and decision-making required) . It is less about by the way, if you follow this link there is more about it; and it is not about linking to something that is best guess about to where it should link.There is a some good discussions about portals at here here and especially here. ”
Source: Wikisource

Scriptorium/Archives/2011-05

“ Proposal to change the syntax of {{SIC}} I propose to change the syntax of {{SIC}} so that it does exactly what it already does in Page: namespace only; in main space (i.e. when Page:s are transcluded) it would simply display the corrected word. That way, non-editor readers aren't unnecessarily confronted with misprints in our sources, but simply see the corrected text. Editors of Page:s would still see the text as originally printed, along with the corrected text upon mouseover. What do others think? ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature