Summary

Portrait of Simon Newcomb Simon Newcomb 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 6… (1911)

A comet moving in a decidedly hyperbolic orbit must have come from so great a distance within a finite time, say a few millions of years, as to have no relation to the sun, and must after its approach to the sun return into space, never again to visit our system. In this case the motion of the sun through space renders it almost infinitely improbable that the orbit would have been so nearly a parabola as all such orbits are actually found to be.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Simon Newcomb Simon Newcomb 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 6… (1911)

We must regard it as well established that comets are not, like planets and satellites, permanent in mass, but are continuously losing minute portions of the matter which belongs to them, through a progressive dissipation—at least when they are in the neighbourhood of the sun. When near perihelion the matter of a comet is seen to be undergoing a process in the nature of evaporation, successive envelopes of vapour rising from the nucleus to form the coma, and then gradually repelled from the sun to form the tail.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature