Summary

Stanley Arthur Cook 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 15… (1911)

The elaborate account of the exodus gives the prevailing views which supersede other traditions of the origin both of the Israelites and of the worship of Yahweh (Gen. iv. 26) . Several motives have influenced its growth, [6] and the kernel—the revelation of Yahweh to Moses—has been developed until all the tribes of Israel are included and their history as a people now begins. The old traditions of conquest in central Palestine have similarly been extended, and have been adapted to the now familiar view of Israelite origins.
Source: Wikisource

Stanley Arthur Cook 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 15… (1911)

The serious character of the problems of early Israelite history can be perceived from the renewed endeavours to present an adequate outline of the course of events; for a criticism of the most prominent hypotheses see Cheyne, Ency. Bib. art. “Tribes” (col. 5209 seq.) ; a new theory has been more recently advanced by E. Meyer (Die Israeliten u. ihre Nachbarstämme, 1906) . But Joshua as a tribal hero does not belong to the earliest phase in the surviving traditions. He has no place in the oldest surviving narratives of the exodus (Wellhausen, Steuernagel)
Source: Wikisource

Stanley Arthur Cook 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 15… (1911)

The book of Joshua has ascribed to one man conquests which are not confirmed by subsequent history. The capture of Bethel, implied rather than described in Joshua viii., is elsewhere the work of the Joseph tribes (Judges i. 22 sqq., cf. features in the conquest of Jericho, Joshua vi. 25) . Joshua’s victory in north Palestine has its parallel in Judges iv. at another period (see Deborah) , and Adoni-zedek of Jerusalem (Joshua x.) can scarcely be severed from the Adoni-bezek taken by the tribes of Judah and Simeon (Judges i. 5–7) .
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature